Asian Parliamentary Openness Index 2026

Assessment date: October 2026

Indonesia

Key findings

Based on the assessment held by the PMOs, there are some challenges in 3 aspects that are evaluated by this assessment in the Indonesian Parliament. In the Parliament accountability aspect, some notable findings are that the Indonesian Parliament is still not publishing its own assessments of the assets of public officials; the asset assessment and publication are conducted by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) annually. PMO also finds that Indonesian Parliament still inconsistent to practicing meaningful participation that can be seen as the public involvement and influences are still limited to affect parliament policy and decision making, moreover the accesibility to the parliament are still lacking, therefore the meaningful participation has been legalized by Indonesian Law. Lastly, PMO sees that the Indonesian Parliament is still inconsistent in practicing transparency in its work; the Indonesian Parliament has indeed done live broadcasting through several meetings, but the publication of meeting documents is still limited.

Aggregated score

Across both chambers

31.20%

(16.25/52.08)

Openness on Information
31.54% (10.75/34.08)
Openness on Accountability
33.33% (2/6)
Openness on Citizen Participation
29.17% (3.5/12)

Lower chamber

29.62%

(7.88/26.58)

Openness on Information
30.57% (5.38/17.58)
Openness on Accountability
33.33% (1/3)
Openness on Citizen Participation
25.00% (1.5/6)

Upper chamber

32.84%

(8.38/25.5)

Openness on Information
32.58% (5.38/16.5)
Openness on Accountability
33.33% (1/3)
Openness on Citizen Participation
33.33% (2/6)
Share

How a parliament proactively discloses comprehensive legislative, financial, administrative, and procedural data in accessible formats.

22 indicators

Grouped by

Not achieved (12 indicators)

All questions within the indicator receive a score of 0, excluding those that are not applicable to the country context.

Not achieved

0.00/1.00

1 country achieved
Not achieved

0.00/0.50

4 countries achieved
Not achieved

0.00/0.50

2 countries achieved
Not achieved

0.00/0.50

5 countries achieved
Not achieved

0.00/0.50

1 country achieved
Not achieved

0.00/0.50

1 country achieved
Not achieved

0.00/0.50

6 countries achieved
Not achieved

0.00/0.33

7 countries achieved
Not achieved

0.00/0.75

5 countries achieved
Not achieved

0.00/1.00

4 countries achieved
Not achieved

0.00/1.00

6 countries achieved
Not achieved

0.00/0.50

4 countries achieved

Partly achieved (4 indicators)

The indicator receives some score, excluding those that are not applicable to the country context.

Partly achieved

0.25/1.00

4 countries achieved
Partly achieved

0.50/1.00

5 countries achieved
Partly achieved

0.50/1.00

4 countries achieved
Partly achieved

0.13/3.00

0 countries achieved

Achieved (4 indicators)

All questions within the indicator receive a full score, excluding those that are not applicable to the country context.

Achieved

1.00/1.00

6 countries achieved
Achieved

1.00/1.00

9 countries achieved
Achieved

1.00/1.00

6 countries achieved
Achieved

1.00/1.00

6 countries achieved

N/A (2 indicators)

All questions within the indicator are not applicable to the country context.

N/A
5 countries achieved
N/A
4 countries achieved

About the respondent

Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia / Indonesian Centre for Law and Policy Studies (PSHK)

The Indonesian Center for Law and Policy Studies (PSHK) is a research and advocacy institution dedicated to legal reform in Indonesia, with a particular focus on legislation, justice and civic space. In the field of legislation, PSHK carries out three main activities, namely legislative monitoring, legislative assessment, and legislative drafting.

Year the organization began monitoring Parliament

Since its establishment in 1998.

Name of respondent

  • Bugivia Maharani
  • Fajri Nursyamsi
  • M Nur Ramadhan

Email of respondent to correspond with

[email protected]

Indonesian Parliamentary Center (IPC)

Indonesian Parliamentary Center is an independent non-governmental organization based in Indonesia, committed to promoting parliamentary reform, democratic deepening, and active citizen participation. Since its establishment, IPC has worked to enhance transparency, accountability, and the quality of legislation, aiming to build a more open and responsive parliamentary system.

Year the organization began monitoring Parliament

2005

Name of respondent

  • I Gede Oka Kertiyasa
  • Arif Adiputro
  • Ahmad Hanafi

Email of respondent to correspond with

[email protected]

Conduct deeper analysis

Machine-readable data for all countries in this cycle is available for download.

For academic use, please contact Professor Akihiro Ogawa (Email: [email protected] )

Download raw data

Submit your feedback

If you have concerns about a country’s score, suggestions for improving the index, or feedback on the website experience, you can submit feedback. Your input will be reviewed and shared with the team best placed to address it.

Feedback form